Prioritário:
0. Estudar bem:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=893
http://www.managingip.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=1852796&LS=EMS157502
http://www.eff.org/pages/new-wipo-development-agenda
1. estudar muito bem o SPLT:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_Patent_Law_Treaty
2. estudar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents_under_TRIPs_Agreement
3. pesquisar o "Post-TRIPs expansionism"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_on_Trade-Related_Aspects_of_Intellectual_Property_Rights
em particular:
- The wording of Trips 27 of non-discrimination is used to justify an extension of the patent system.
entender
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=865
ler artigo com muito referência ao TRIPS e aos países em desenvolvimento.
http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=11117
http://cgkd.anu.edu.au/menus/PDFs/Palombi%20(RECIIS)%20eng.pdf
4. Entender o que está por trás desse PCT:
Peters noted that the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) already harmonises patents and some formalities associated with the process. If everyone complied with the PCT, he said, additional local rules should not be needed.
O que aprendi:
WIPO tá fora do jogo:
In the 1980s, this led to the United States and other developed countries "forum shifting" intellectual property standard-setting out of WIPO and into the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which later evolved into the World Trade Organization, where the North had greater control of the agenda. This strategy paid dividends with the enactment of Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.
Rafael Carreño is an advisor to Servicio Autónomo de la Propiedad Intelectual (SAPI) of Venezuela
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=855
movement to amend TRIPS in a similar way to drug patent: environment technology
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=851
Pesquisar
Descobrir/contactar pessoal os brasileiros dessa lista
http://www.iqsensato.org/?p=27
wipo activities
http://wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=15082
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Movement_against_intellectual_property
Ver o que ffii assinou:
http://ipjustice.org/WIPO/NGO_Statement.shtml
interessante para entender a ação do Brasil na WTO
http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=11225
WIPO and DMCA:
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/29/1523217
verificar se tem coisa importante aí:
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2008/01/article_0012.html
verficar do que se trata:
http://ipjustice.org/
Entender tratado com Peru
http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-27489/us-peru-free-trade-agreement-to-require-software-patents
O que é que esse CAFTA fala das patentes de software (aqui só aparecem remédios):
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=857
ler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patent
ler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_258/03
a parte do WTO do texto de Andre:
http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-30546/engineering-industry-support-for-ooxml-novell
Disparités constatées quant à l'application de l'Accord sur les ADPIC dans les pays en développement:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=886
Brasileiros ligados a WIPO:
Jorge Costa Avila, president, Brazilian Institute of Industrial Property
José Graça Aranha, WIPO director of the international
registrations department, sector of trademarks, industrial designs and
geographical indications
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=880
descobrir o que o cara da EFF que entra no lugar de Erik fez na a2k: Eddan Katz
Sobre a patentability do software (entender a divergência legal):
http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-31757/can-the-epo-correct-its-software-patent-propaganda
References:
dois artigos atacando patentes em geral:
http://www.phoenix-center.org/pcpp/PCPP30Final.pdf
http://researchoninnovation.org/dopatentswork/
artigo contra swpats:
http://legalpad.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/02/28/ending-software-patents-has-the-time-come/?source=yahoo_quote
Contatos:
Embassy of Venezuela in Brussels, Belgium - 10, Avenue Franklin Roosevelt, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium. Tel: (322) 639 0340, 5262. Fax: (322) 647 8820.
Também legal:
referências:
a2k (iniciativa mencionada no artigo da wikipedia sobre WIPO):
http://www.cptech.org/a2k/
a2k: geneva declaration legal mas tudo é de 2004
http://www.cptech.org/ip/wipo/genevadeclaration.html
http://www.cptech.org/a2k/a2k_treaty_may9.pdf
na imprensa:
http://www.a-brest.net/article841.html
fala da "geographical location protection" mas identifica grupos na WTO
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=859
patentes em diversos países:
http://www.cato.org/pubs/efw/efw2002/efw02-ch2.pdf
diferença entre países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento (não sei se as
conclusões são boas):
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v38/n6/abs/8400306a.html
interessante para saber o que standard significa em outras áreas:
http://www.newapproach.org/ProductFamilies/Keywords.asp
lista das "Multilateral Conventions" que a Un. Eur. impoe a Montenegro:
http://www.lalibre.be/index.php?view=article&art_id=393807
pode ajudar a formar argumentos contra patentes (de sw ou não):
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/01/12/epo-uspto-saturation/
Ótimo artigo de Stiglitz
http://mailman.cipaco.org/listarchive/ipr-ict/msg00169.html
checar:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=897
checar o que esses economistas dizem:
http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0085.html
Acho que a Coréia é um bom candidato a participar da iniciativa:
http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=546
Caso super interessante. Por que é que os países em desenvolvimento têm que pagar para produzir cds?
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=907
propaganda suja da WIPO:
http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0087.html
http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0086.html
costa rica
http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2007/12/GARITA/15383
disputa interessante na WTO:
http://www.iqsensato.org/?p=43
sobre swpat: parece bem interessante
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080215/174009268.shtml
aumentar o número de patentes: bom, mas não basta
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=935
várias estatísticas sobre patentes na WIPO (e o comentário do IPKAT, o comentário final que fala da Colômbia, dá um bom argumento):
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=935
http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/02/pct-filings-for-2007-cause-for.html
Blogger expõe a claramente Idéia de que a Europa depende de patentes para sobreviver. Será que estudos confirmam que a Europa ganha mesmo com as patentes?
http://ipgeek.blogspot.com/2008/02/is-asia-surpassing-europe-in-innovation.html
Hartmut fala de trips, noções bem definidas, mas pouco appealing:
http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/amends05/juri0504/mgp/mgp00001.html
basear os argumentos nesse tipo de dado: o sistema de patentes é ruim até para os países desenvolvidos:
http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=582
Reinier diz que é uma indicação de que sw e bm pats estão sendo questionados nos US
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130%20order.pdf
talvez bons links para atacar a idéia de que "more patents = more innovation"
http://techdirt.com/articles/20080306/143656468.shtml
good list of bad patents and of patent threats
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/12/patent-trolls-on-the-offensive/
parece trazer bons argumentos:
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=95
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=96
interessante mais pelo tom do que pelo conteúdo:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=975
muito interessante!
http://www.tectonic.co.za/?p=2304
quoted by Andre to show that WIPO does not examine patents. "WIPO does nothing. It just sacks in the fees."
http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/texts/articles/a32.htm
bom artigo sobre a "patent mess" a as reformas americanas que não vão mudar muito
http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/clean-up-patent-mess.ars
histórias dos swpats nos US: técnico e interessante
http://www.uiowa.edu/~cyberlaw/cls99/sempaper/solberpp/sld001.htm
lista de recomendações contra excesso de patentes da Federal Trade Commission
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/innovationrpt.pdf
mostra que iqsensato está ocupada com as tais recomendações, mas os papers não tem nada de muito interessante:
http://www.iqsensato.org/?page_id=49
Chamada de Roy Schestowitz contra a wipo (não tem muito conteúdo, mas vale pelo tom)
http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/29/wipo-patent-threat/
Importante, ler:
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0001.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0004.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0007.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0008.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0010.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0009.html
boa introdução à questões que considero de menor importância mas que aparecem muito
http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/04/gis-for-food-products.html
investigar
http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=674
muito importante! Perú buscará consenso con socios andinos en propiedad intelectual para avanzar negociación con Unión Europea
http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=11935
descobrir quem são esses aliados
http://www.m-cam.com/downloads/Financial_Times_Ad.pdf
examplo de tentativa "to amend TRIPS"
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1030
patentes na China: o previsível
http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=239
procurar gente
Sangeeta Shashikant está em Genebra?
http://www.tacd.org/events/intellectual-property/s_shashikant.ppt
very nice discourse, no awareness of swpat/bsnpat issue
Thiru Balasubramaniam
interesting article against sw/business patents
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=921252
commented here
http://techliberation.com/2008/06/30/patent-sharks/
unfortunately spoiled on the conclusion…
livro: The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives
http://www.amazon.com/Gridlock-Economy-Ownership-Markets-Innovation/dp/0465029167/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1215313491&sr=8-1/marginalrevol-20
good info against swpats
http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-76937/epo-says-the-term-software-is-ambiguous-and-prefers-to-use-tautology-for-more-clarity
good video against swpats
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/07/28/turning-point-swpats/
The government of Australia is considering overhauling patent laws
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=106
entender greve do EPO
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/02/epo-patent-office-corruption/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/06/the-failure-of-the-patent-system/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/09/30/patents-financial-collapse/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/08/sun-telecom-and-apple/
talvez interesse para mostrar que a questão de swpats não está decidida
http://www.nytimes.com/external/idg/2008/10/24/24idg-EU-software-pat.html
http://www.epo.org/topics/news/2008/20081024.html
novos links falando da idea do David Miller de finantial collapse
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/05/ideas-are-not-a-property/
a ler: Bilski principalmente
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/05/ideas-are-not-a-property/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/07/india-bilski-and-some-cronies/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/10/billg-searete-patent-crusade/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/12/innovations-and-impending-changes/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/13/rebilski-and-reform/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/14/enlarged-board-of-appeal-epo/
http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=339903
http://www.fsf.org/news/esp-bilski
http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/11/06/ruling-to-block-business-method-patents-may-spur-innovation-say-entrepreneurs-and-investors/
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=3052
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/ex-parte-hallig.html
falar de qualidade é um bom argumento
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/junk-patents.html
citar Maskin
http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/Economist_Critic_of_Software_Patents_gets_Nobel_Prize
site a imitar? é wikidot?
http://stopsoftwarepatents.org/
Benson e Bilski: análise interessante
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=110
exemplo de conflito patente x concorrência na área farmacêutica
http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2008/11/28/bruxelles-accuse-l-industrie-pharmaceutique-de-bloquer-les-medicaments-generiques_1124383_3244.html#xtor=RSS-3214
investigate patent paradox
- see message from Reinier
- anti pharma patent activism talking about TRIPS+
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/intellectual_property/info.service/2008/twn.ipr.info.081104.htm