Links: patents and geopolitics

Prioritário:

0. Estudar bem:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=893
http://www.managingip.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=1852796&LS=EMS157502
http://www.eff.org/pages/new-wipo-development-agenda

1. estudar muito bem o SPLT:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_Patent_Law_Treaty

2. estudar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents_under_TRIPs_Agreement

3. pesquisar o "Post-TRIPs expansionism"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_on_Trade-Related_Aspects_of_Intellectual_Property_Rights

em particular:
- The wording of Trips 27 of non-discrimination is used to justify an extension of the patent system.

entender
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=865

ler artigo com muito referência ao TRIPS e aos países em desenvolvimento.
http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=11117
http://cgkd.anu.edu.au/menus/PDFs/Palombi%20(RECIIS)%20eng.pdf

4. Entender o que está por trás desse PCT:

Peters noted that the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) already harmonises patents and some formalities associated with the process. If everyone complied with the PCT, he said, additional local rules should not be needed.

O que aprendi:

WIPO tá fora do jogo:
In the 1980s, this led to the United States and other developed countries "forum shifting" intellectual property standard-setting out of WIPO and into the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which later evolved into the World Trade Organization, where the North had greater control of the agenda. This strategy paid dividends with the enactment of Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.

Rafael Carreño is an advisor to Servicio Autónomo de la Propiedad Intelectual (SAPI) of Venezuela
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=855

movement to amend TRIPS in a similar way to drug patent: environment technology
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=851

Pesquisar

Descobrir/contactar pessoal os brasileiros dessa lista
http://www.iqsensato.org/?p=27

wipo activities
http://wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=15082

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Movement_against_intellectual_property

Ver o que ffii assinou:
http://ipjustice.org/WIPO/NGO_Statement.shtml

interessante para entender a ação do Brasil na WTO
http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=11225

WIPO and DMCA:
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/29/1523217

verificar se tem coisa importante aí:
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2008/01/article_0012.html

verficar do que se trata:
http://ipjustice.org/

Entender tratado com Peru
http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-27489/us-peru-free-trade-agreement-to-require-software-patents

O que é que esse CAFTA fala das patentes de software (aqui só aparecem remédios):
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=857

ler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patent
ler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_258/03

a parte do WTO do texto de Andre:
http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-30546/engineering-industry-support-for-ooxml-novell

Disparités constatées quant à l'application de l'Accord sur les ADPIC dans les pays en développement:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=886

Brasileiros ligados a WIPO:
Jorge Costa Avila, president, Brazilian Institute of Industrial Property
José Graça Aranha, WIPO director of the international
registrations department, sector of trademarks, industrial designs and
geographical indications
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=880

descobrir o que o cara da EFF que entra no lugar de Erik fez na a2k: Eddan Katz

Sobre a patentability do software (entender a divergência legal):

http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-31757/can-the-epo-correct-its-software-patent-propaganda

References:

dois artigos atacando patentes em geral:
http://www.phoenix-center.org/pcpp/PCPP30Final.pdf
http://researchoninnovation.org/dopatentswork/

artigo contra swpats:
http://legalpad.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/02/28/ending-software-patents-has-the-time-come/?source=yahoo_quote

Contatos:

Embassy of Venezuela in Brussels, Belgium - 10, Avenue Franklin Roosevelt, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium. Tel: (322) 639 0340, 5262. Fax: (322) 647 8820.

Também legal:

referências:
a2k (iniciativa mencionada no artigo da wikipedia sobre WIPO):
http://www.cptech.org/a2k/

a2k: geneva declaration legal mas tudo é de 2004
http://www.cptech.org/ip/wipo/genevadeclaration.html
http://www.cptech.org/a2k/a2k_treaty_may9.pdf

na imprensa:
http://www.a-brest.net/article841.html

fala da "geographical location protection" mas identifica grupos na WTO
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=859

patentes em diversos países:
http://www.cato.org/pubs/efw/efw2002/efw02-ch2.pdf

diferença entre países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento (não sei se as
conclusões são boas):
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v38/n6/abs/8400306a.html

interessante para saber o que standard significa em outras áreas:
http://www.newapproach.org/ProductFamilies/Keywords.asp

lista das "Multilateral Conventions" que a Un. Eur. impoe a Montenegro:
http://www.lalibre.be/index.php?view=article&art_id=393807

pode ajudar a formar argumentos contra patentes (de sw ou não):
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/01/12/epo-uspto-saturation/

Ótimo artigo de Stiglitz
http://mailman.cipaco.org/listarchive/ipr-ict/msg00169.html

checar:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=897

checar o que esses economistas dizem:
http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0085.html

Acho que a Coréia é um bom candidato a participar da iniciativa:
http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=546

Caso super interessante. Por que é que os países em desenvolvimento têm que pagar para produzir cds?
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=907

propaganda suja da WIPO:
http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0087.html
http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0086.html

costa rica
http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2007/12/GARITA/15383

disputa interessante na WTO:
http://www.iqsensato.org/?p=43

sobre swpat: parece bem interessante
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080215/174009268.shtml

aumentar o número de patentes: bom, mas não basta
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=935

várias estatísticas sobre patentes na WIPO (e o comentário do IPKAT, o comentário final que fala da Colômbia, dá um bom argumento):
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=935
http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/02/pct-filings-for-2007-cause-for.html

Blogger expõe a claramente Idéia de que a Europa depende de patentes para sobreviver. Será que estudos confirmam que a Europa ganha mesmo com as patentes?
http://ipgeek.blogspot.com/2008/02/is-asia-surpassing-europe-in-innovation.html

Hartmut fala de trips, noções bem definidas, mas pouco appealing:
http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/amends05/juri0504/mgp/mgp00001.html

basear os argumentos nesse tipo de dado: o sistema de patentes é ruim até para os países desenvolvidos:
http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=582

Reinier diz que é uma indicação de que sw e bm pats estão sendo questionados nos US
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130%20order.pdf

talvez bons links para atacar a idéia de que "more patents = more innovation"
http://techdirt.com/articles/20080306/143656468.shtml

good list of bad patents and of patent threats
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/12/patent-trolls-on-the-offensive/

parece trazer bons argumentos:
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=95
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=96

interessante mais pelo tom do que pelo conteúdo:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=975

muito interessante!
http://www.tectonic.co.za/?p=2304

quoted by Andre to show that WIPO does not examine patents. "WIPO does nothing. It just sacks in the fees."
http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/texts/articles/a32.htm

bom artigo sobre a "patent mess" a as reformas americanas que não vão mudar muito
http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/clean-up-patent-mess.ars

histórias dos swpats nos US: técnico e interessante
http://www.uiowa.edu/~cyberlaw/cls99/sempaper/solberpp/sld001.htm

lista de recomendações contra excesso de patentes da Federal Trade Commission
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/innovationrpt.pdf

mostra que iqsensato está ocupada com as tais recomendações, mas os papers não tem nada de muito interessante:
http://www.iqsensato.org/?page_id=49

Chamada de Roy Schestowitz contra a wipo (não tem muito conteúdo, mas vale pelo tom)
http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/29/wipo-patent-threat/

Importante, ler:
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0001.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0004.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0007.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0008.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0010.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0009.html

boa introdução à questões que considero de menor importância mas que aparecem muito
http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/04/gis-for-food-products.html

investigar
http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=674

muito importante! Perú buscará consenso con socios andinos en propiedad intelectual para avanzar negociación con Unión Europea
http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=11935

descobrir quem são esses aliados
http://www.m-cam.com/downloads/Financial_Times_Ad.pdf

examplo de tentativa "to amend TRIPS"
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1030

patentes na China: o previsível
http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=239

procurar gente
Sangeeta Shashikant está em Genebra?
http://www.tacd.org/events/intellectual-property/s_shashikant.ppt
very nice discourse, no awareness of swpat/bsnpat issue

Thiru Balasubramaniam

interesting article against sw/business patents
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=921252
commented here
http://techliberation.com/2008/06/30/patent-sharks/
unfortunately spoiled on the conclusion…

livro: The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives
http://www.amazon.com/Gridlock-Economy-Ownership-Markets-Innovation/dp/0465029167/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1215313491&sr=8-1/marginalrevol-20

good info against swpats
http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-76937/epo-says-the-term-software-is-ambiguous-and-prefers-to-use-tautology-for-more-clarity

good video against swpats
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/07/28/turning-point-swpats/

The government of Australia is considering overhauling patent laws
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=106

entender greve do EPO
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/02/epo-patent-office-corruption/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/06/the-failure-of-the-patent-system/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/09/30/patents-financial-collapse/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/08/sun-telecom-and-apple/

talvez interesse para mostrar que a questão de swpats não está decidida
http://www.nytimes.com/external/idg/2008/10/24/24idg-EU-software-pat.html
http://www.epo.org/topics/news/2008/20081024.html

novos links falando da idea do David Miller de finantial collapse
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/05/ideas-are-not-a-property/

a ler: Bilski principalmente
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/05/ideas-are-not-a-property/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/07/india-bilski-and-some-cronies/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/10/billg-searete-patent-crusade/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/12/innovations-and-impending-changes/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/13/rebilski-and-reform/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/14/enlarged-board-of-appeal-epo/
http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=339903
http://www.fsf.org/news/esp-bilski
http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/11/06/ruling-to-block-business-method-patents-may-spur-innovation-say-entrepreneurs-and-investors/
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=3052
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/ex-parte-hallig.html

falar de qualidade é um bom argumento
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/junk-patents.html

citar Maskin
http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/Economist_Critic_of_Software_Patents_gets_Nobel_Prize

site a imitar? é wikidot?
http://stopsoftwarepatents.org/

Benson e Bilski: análise interessante
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=110

exemplo de conflito patente x concorrência na área farmacêutica
http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2008/11/28/bruxelles-accuse-l-industrie-pharmaceutique-de-bloquer-les-medicaments-generiques_1124383_3244.html#xtor=RSS-3214

investigate patent paradox
- see message from Reinier

- anti pharma patent activism talking about TRIPS+
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/intellectual_property/info.service/2008/twn.ipr.info.081104.htm

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License