referências:
a2k (iniciativa mencionada no artigo da wikipedia sobre WIPO):
http://www.cptech.org/a2k/
a2k: geneva declaration legal mas tudo é de 2004
http://www.cptech.org/ip/wipo/genevadeclaration.html
http://www.cptech.org/a2k/a2k_treaty_may9.pdf
na imprensa:
http://www.a-brest.net/article841.html
fala da "geographical location protection" mas identifica grupos na WTO
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=859
patentes em diversos países:
http://www.cato.org/pubs/efw/efw2002/efw02-ch2.pdf
diferença entre países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento (não sei se as
conclusões são boas):
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v38/n6/abs/8400306a.html
interessante para saber o que standard significa em outras áreas:
http://www.newapproach.org/ProductFamilies/Keywords.asp
lista das "Multilateral Conventions" que a Un. Eur. impoe a Montenegro:
http://www.lalibre.be/index.php?view=article&art_id=393807
pode ajudar a formar argumentos contra patentes (de sw ou não):
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/01/12/epo-uspto-saturation/
Ótimo artigo de Stiglitz
http://mailman.cipaco.org/listarchive/ipr-ict/msg00169.html
checar:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=897
checar o que esses economistas dizem:
http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0085.html
Acho que a Coréia é um bom candidato a participar da iniciativa:
http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=546
Caso super interessante. Por que é que os países em desenvolvimento têm que pagar para produzir cds?
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=907
propaganda suja da WIPO:
http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0087.html
http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0086.html
costa rica
http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2007/12/GARITA/15383
disputa interessante na WTO:
http://www.iqsensato.org/?p=43
sobre swpat: parece bem interessante
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080215/174009268.shtml
aumentar o número de patentes: bom, mas não basta
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=935
várias estatísticas sobre patentes na WIPO (e o comentário do IPKAT, o comentário final que fala da Colômbia, dá um bom argumento):
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=935
http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/02/pct-filings-for-2007-cause-for.html
Blogger expõe a claramente Idéia de que a Europa depende de patentes para sobreviver. Será que estudos confirmam que a Europa ganha mesmo com as patentes?
http://ipgeek.blogspot.com/2008/02/is-asia-surpassing-europe-in-innovation.html
Hartmut fala de trips, noções bem definidas, mas pouco appealing:
http://eupat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/amends05/juri0504/mgp/mgp00001.html
basear os argumentos nesse tipo de dado: o sistema de patentes é ruim até para os países desenvolvidos:
http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=582
Reinier diz que é uma indicação de que sw e bm pats estão sendo questionados nos US
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130%20order.pdf
talvez bons links para atacar a idéia de que "more patents = more innovation"
http://techdirt.com/articles/20080306/143656468.shtml
good list of bad patents and of patent threats
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/12/patent-trolls-on-the-offensive/
parece trazer bons argumentos:
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=95
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=96
interessante mais pelo tom do que pelo conteúdo:
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=975
muito interessante!
http://www.tectonic.co.za/?p=2304
quoted by Andre to show that WIPO does not examine patents. "WIPO does nothing. It just sacks in the fees."
http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/texts/articles/a32.htm
bom artigo sobre a "patent mess" a as reformas americanas que não vão mudar muito
http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/clean-up-patent-mess.ars
histórias dos swpats nos US: técnico e interessante
http://www.uiowa.edu/~cyberlaw/cls99/sempaper/solberpp/sld001.htm
lista de recomendações contra excesso de patentes da Federal Trade Commission
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/innovationrpt.pdf
mostra que iqsensato está ocupada com as tais recomendações, mas os papers não tem nada de muito interessante:
http://www.iqsensato.org/?page_id=49
Chamada de Roy Schestowitz contra a wipo (não tem muito conteúdo, mas vale pelo tom)
http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/29/wipo-patent-threat/
Importante, ler:
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0001.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0004.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0007.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0008.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0010.html
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0009.html
boa introdução à questões que considero de menor importância mas que aparecem muito
http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/04/gis-for-food-products.html
investigar
http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=674
muito importante! Perú buscará consenso con socios andinos en propiedad intelectual para avanzar negociación con Unión Europea
http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=11935
descobrir quem são esses aliados
http://www.m-cam.com/downloads/Financial_Times_Ad.pdf
examplo de tentativa "to amend TRIPS"
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1030
patentes na China: o previsível
http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=239
procurar gente
Sangeeta Shashikant está em Genebra?
http://www.tacd.org/events/intellectual-property/s_shashikant.ppt
very nice discourse, no awareness of swpat/bsnpat issue
Thiru Balasubramaniam
interesting article against sw/business patents
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=921252
commented here
http://techliberation.com/2008/06/30/patent-sharks/
unfortunately spoiled on the conclusion…
livro: The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives
http://www.amazon.com/Gridlock-Economy-Ownership-Markets-Innovation/dp/0465029167/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1215313491&sr=8-1/marginalrevol-20
good info against swpats
http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-76937/epo-says-the-term-software-is-ambiguous-and-prefers-to-use-tautology-for-more-clarity
good video against swpats
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/07/28/turning-point-swpats/
The government of Australia is considering overhauling patent laws
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=106
entender greve do EPO
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/02/epo-patent-office-corruption/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/06/the-failure-of-the-patent-system/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/09/30/patents-financial-collapse/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/08/sun-telecom-and-apple/
talvez interesse para mostrar que a questão de swpats não está decidida
http://www.nytimes.com/external/idg/2008/10/24/24idg-EU-software-pat.html
http://www.epo.org/topics/news/2008/20081024.html
novos links falando da idea do David Miller de finantial collapse
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/05/ideas-are-not-a-property/
a ler: Bilski principalmente
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081103134949355
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/05/ideas-are-not-a-property/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/07/india-bilski-and-some-cronies/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/10/billg-searete-patent-crusade/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/12/innovations-and-impending-changes/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/13/rebilski-and-reform/
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/14/enlarged-board-of-appeal-epo/
http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=339903
http://www.fsf.org/news/esp-bilski
http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/11/06/ruling-to-block-business-method-patents-may-spur-innovation-say-entrepreneurs-and-investors/
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=3052
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/ex-parte-hallig.html
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/26/patents-government-gets-involved/
falar de qualidade é um bom argumento
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/junk-patents.html
citar Maskin
http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/Economist_Critic_of_Software_Patents_gets_Nobel_Prize
site a imitar? é wikidot?
http://stopsoftwarepatents.org/
Benson e Bilski: análise interessante
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=110
exemplo de conflito patente x concorrência na área farmacêutica
http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2008/11/28/bruxelles-accuse-l-industrie-pharmaceutique-de-bloquer-les-medicaments-generiques_1124383_3244.html#xtor=RSS-3214
investigate patent paradox
- see message from Reinier
- anti pharma patent activism talking about TRIPS+
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/intellectual_property/info.service/2008/twn.ipr.info.081104.htm
- Brazil challeging current practices on drug patents. Should to the same for other kinds of patents. It's clear that patents are abused in a lot of domains. Let's challenge them!
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1344
- perhaps a good contact person: Marcia Aribela L.G. Pereira from IQsensato, A2K
http://www.iqsensato.org/?p=497
- wipo news
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1382
- wipo worried about sw patentability (*++)
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2008/06/article_0006.html
- WIPO view on A2K3 conference
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2008/06/article_0007.html
- WIPO IP funding (boring ugly stuff to read)
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2008/05/article_0001.html
- How pression on Brazil, India is made (+++)
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1387
- Roy covering different insteresting issues
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/03/31/patents-roundup-red-hat-et-al/